Anuradha v. Ut Of Chandigarh And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34395 of 2016 Date of Decision:- 01.05.2017 Anuradha ....Petitioner
Versus
U.T of Chandigarh and others ....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:
Mr. Paramjit Singh Bal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Ashima Mor, Advocate for U.T., Chandigarh.
Mr. A.D.S. Sukhija, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 and 6.
**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Ravinder Singh, has informed that the petitioner has given in writing that she does not want to pursue her complaint (Annexure P-3).
In view of above facts, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition and accordingly the same is hereby disposed of. May 01, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2017.05.05 15:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh