Ibrahim v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-34509 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 20, 2018 Mohd. Ibrahim

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Sachin Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sukhdeep Parmar, DAG, Haryana for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.195 dated 10.06.2018 under Sections 406, 420, 506 and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Sohna, Gurugram.

Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel appeared and contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that as per the FIR, 390 iron shuttering plates worth `4,29,000/- were taken on lease by Imran and Juber on 04.03.2018 and later on, they misappropriated the iron shuttering plates. VINEET GULATI 2018.08.21 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-34509 of 2018 -2The present petitioner is also named in the FIR and specific allegation regarding active participation has been alleged against him. Learned State counsel contended that only some plates have been recovered and remaining recovery is still to be made. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, I find that petitioner is required for custodial interrogation and no ground is made to grant benefit of anticipatory bail to him. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

August 20, 2018 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2018.08.21 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh