Tarinder Pal v. State Of Haryana & ANR




   

 



 

  
  

  !"

#$%&'($)#* )( % % &($ ($+,+  # ( -.#$/#&##&

($ (+0 &'(& +
 . 1!23
 
.3.4 * * * * Present : Mr. Sidharth Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. D. K. Grewal, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate for respondent No.2. 




   
The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.271 dated 16.10.2013 registered against the petitioner and others under Sections 420, 427, 464, 468, 471, 489 and 506 read with Section 1202B IPC at Police Station Sirsa Sadar, District Sirsa and the consequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of written compromise (Annexure P22) arrived at between the parties. Report has been received from learned ACJM, Sirsa after statements of the parties were recorded regarding the compromise. Learned ACJM has reported that the compromise between the petitioner and the complainant is voluntary and without any pressure or coercion. Learned ACJM has also sent copy of the statements of parties. The statements reveal that there are other accused also but













 the compromise has been effected between the petitioner and the complainant only.

Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that respondent no.2 is the only aggrieved person in this FIR. No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR pending.

In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in




    

      



!

"#, approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in $





      

"

"

 , the instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid FIR and all consequent proceedings conducted on the basis thereof are quashed qua the petitioner only.

Needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.











   

















 








RAJ KUMAR 2015.12.01 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document