High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/33620/2017disposed of

Naveen Kumar v. State Of Haryana

2018-05-02Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33620-2017 Date of decision: 02.05.2018 Naveen Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Ankur Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition that has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 333 dated 05.07.2017 under Sections 323/ 34/ 498-A IPC, registered at Police Station S.G.M. Nagar, District Faridabad.

This Court was pleased to pass the following order on 12.09.2017 :- "This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 333 dated 05.07.2017 under Sections 323/34/498-A IPC registered at Police Station S.G.M. Nagar, District Faridabad.

It is argued that the petitioner tried to have the matter mediated before the Women Cell, Delhi, however, the mediation failed on account of the fact that the complainant failed to appear after putting appearance once. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Satyawan 2018.05.04 12:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-33620-2017 -2petitioner is ready to settle all disputes amicably and the matter should be referred for mediation.

Notice of motion.

Let the parties appear before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court on 03.10.2017. The petitioner is also directed to pay a sum of ` 22,000/- as litigation expenses before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court on the date fixed. Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. "

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Learned counsel for the respondent-State confirms the factum of joining investigation by the petitioner.

Since the petitioner has joined the investigation, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 12.09.2017 is hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation; will not leave India without permission of the Court and will comply with the conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 02.05.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2018.05.04 12:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh