Rupinder Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another
IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH 122-2 * +, ,- 0 1
2$3$ *
$$$ ./
$$$/ /
(
!"# $ %&'(# (
!
' Mrs. Kanwal S. Walia, Advoc for the petitioner. cate
!
' ) %$
-& %&+
% . +. + $ /
(12 3 8$& % 4 $ 9&
$ ' '&
! #
/$ +/ 0$/ #$ 0$ 0(
"#! $) %& &'&
- & & % & % &
%'& &' ,)!%
""( '
'& '& ,)6 6 ) % *) % % & 56 )$ & &' &)) &&&& +
-& %7& ,$ '&
! 6 & 6' & 6 & 6&&
% ' &+
& '&'
' &$ ! ' & '&
('' ) ) & '
2' &) &:
:'& % $6 " "/
($ ) &) ) 6
. 6$ &' ' # "/
2 & ) & &' && & ) ') $&6%$
3 $ & $ ) ) 6 &6 + 8
&Rohi 008 Crl. J. 2561. it Kumar Vs. State of Delhi : 20 # 4$& 6&' ) 3 % "/
( & &&
# "/
($ ) ' & ) % % "/ %<' && ,$' ) 6 &6+ 8
$&) $
3 & '/"% 6 ' & &'
)'% ; && Gurappa Gugal and others Vs.
State of M Mysore : 1969 CriLJ 826 and Shokat Ali Vs. State of Haryn na :
2020(2) R CR (Criminal) 339. = 4$& '6& 6 &') 6'&& ) 6)& )&& 2 & +
1 8
& $ &' & % '&& )6) % > ' 3 ' & &' ) % '&& )6 &% &' 3 '&& - 18 18 8+ 1 818
7 676$) ') 6 6 & &' '& &6 &Pawan Kumar Gupta a Vs.
of W.B. : 1973 CriLJ 1368.
The State 2 & ) ) & % % 6& &) , )6$)6) )' % .) & $)& '
% 53 2 6 *) *&' & ) 6
4 ) % % 2 $ % &' & 6& $ ' 2 2$ %)&' & +
% ) 3 &#$ %
& $$ $ '(
!""
2%$6) ' 6 6) )) 6$& & )'&
(123 8$ &
4$9&
$'
' '&
! #
/$ +/ 0$/ #$
0$
0(
"#!$) %& & ' &$ )& &'
9&6) &%7 & )) 6% %&&% $ )& "# ).'
'%$ '
'
$ 7 &* %
- && & $ '%
!' &&& )& '$& '
' '
'
*
,)6$
7 &%' ; $"""* * $ & % & ) $ ) &
*'&&& * (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE 2$3$*
Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Whet ther reportable