Jaggi v. State Of Haryana






    
 




    



!!"  "" #  $ %& '     

   (!

)&$*+( + ,'"" #"- )+(.+%& 
   /,"""'"",) "0!",1 ! 
2

')&,  0(""0$"

!+ 3")+ ',0"! , 1 !   "

" 

 

4  


4')&,   0 "

"0!"50+3")+6,)&'"" ,),0!

"0&   $ 7 8$ " $"'0 "'" 3" 5   0 

! "'0 "'"


95 

& 2

: ;&

 <

:

95 

& 

:
2&  <4=:

95 

& 

:
2& < <;
:

95 

& 

:
2&

>  0  , '""  , , 00!"!",'"",,, )" )"

 "   , 6,"0" &"!, ,00 , #,"

0( %0 ,,'"", , "

 !6,, )",

/,'"" ""0"&, ,",0)6" , "0&  >  0 ,  , , "  ""! ," '&","'"",

" ,?

   , '"" , 0& ! "'"  0  ,  ,0  &7  0'

'6 0 ) )& "! ,'"")," ,) & "  ,"  ,) ')&," " 4 =

 Under these circumstances, the sentence imposed upon the petitioner may be reduced to the one already undergone by him. On the other hand, learned State counsel, while opposing the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the sentence awarded to the petitioner is in proportion to the offence committed by him. The petitioner does not deserve any leniency. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

( '

& " "

 
4

+ '"" , 0& !  0   4,
<&/, + " "6   ,  )""   )& , 0  0  , '""+," " ,"6,  0'

'6"00) )& "! , '""+ 6,   , )  ' )& ,"  " 4 =

+),",)&5" "



 6,"   6  , '""  ) 

  , '"0& ! 

"!0& 5'

! 1 !   "

"   " 6", )" "

"/,   ",6+,00"" /,'""6"00,'", "+" 0&'" "'  (00 '"! ''0"

"+ "  &+  "'  
 





   $ @,,'-"!:  A:7 @,,')0  A:7