← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/34625/2018dismissed

Sandeep Kumar v. State Of Haryana

2018-09-12Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan2 pages

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-34625 of 2018 .....

Date of decision:12.9.2018 Sandeep Kumar

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. P.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

The petitioner has filed this fourth petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.0217 dated 26.5.2016 registered for the offences under Sections 21-B, 22-B and 22-C of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act') at Police Station City Tohana, District Fatehabad. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana has appeared on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2018.09.13 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-34625 of 2018 [2] As per the prosecution version, the present petitioner Sandeep Kumar was apprehended with a plastic bag from which 10000 tablets of Microlit, 120 Injections of Fortwin, 1160 tablets of Alprasafe-0.5, 3120 tablets of Prozolam-0.5, 320 tablets of Zolamac-0.5, 1200 tablets of Eqbrom-10, 6 bottles of Rexcof 100 milligrams cough syrup containing Codeine, 4600 tablets of Carisonia and 100 tablets of Carisol were seized. The FSL report has already been received.

Keeping in view the nature and gravity of the offence and huge recovery from the present petitioner, I do not find it a fit case where the petitioner is entitled for the grant of regular bail. Therefore, finding no merit in this petition, the same is dismissed. As the petitioner has been in custody since 27.5.2016, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial by giving short adjournments and if necessary, by giving day to day adjournments. September 12, 2018.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2018.09.13 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh