Anu Vijan v. Bank Of Baroda And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10100-2019 Date of decision : 12.04.2019 Anu Vijan ........ Petitioner VS Bank of Baroda and another ...... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr.Atul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The prayer made in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for directing the respondent-bank not to proceed against the property and take physical possession of the same. 2.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a comprehensive representation to the respondentBank for the claim made in the writ petition. 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to him in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL ) 12.04.2019 JUDGE anju Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No -22ANJU 2019.04.23 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc