High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/34636/2016allowed

Pawan v. State Of Haryana And ANR

2017-05-12Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

Crl. Misc. No. M-34636 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-34636 of 2016 Date of decision : 12.05.2017 Pawan ......Petitioner versus State of Haryana and anr.

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. D.R. Singla, DAG, Haryana **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Reply filed by learned State counsel in the Court today, is taken on record.

Quashing of FIR No. 607 dated 20.11.2015 under Sections 498-A/406/354-A/377/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sarai Khawaja, District Faridabad is being sought on the basis of compromise deed dated 06.04.2016 (Annexure P-2) Respondent No. 2 got married to petitioner on 17.02.2014. Due to temperamental differences, both the parties could not live together as husband and wife. No child was born out of this wedlock. The relationship between them became strained and F.I.R was registered against the petitioner on account of harassment and humiliation caused by the petitioner on the pretext of bringing less dowry by respondent No. 2. However, the matter has now been duly compromised, on the basis of compromise deed dated 06.04.2016 (Annexure P-2) In compliance of order dated 21.03.2017, report dated GAURAV ARORA 2017.05.24 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-34636 of 2016 29.04.2017 of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Faridabad has been received in this regard. As per report, statement of the complainant and petitioner had been recorded and they stated that the matter has been duly compromised between them. The compromise has been entered voluntarily. The complainant has no objection if the F.I.R be quashed against the petitioner. Further the divorce has also been granted to the parties. Consequently, in view of the status report dated 29.04.2017 and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in cases of Dr. Arvind Barsaul etc. versus State of Madhya Pradesh and another 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 910, Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 429 and the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation.

Accordingly, FIR No. 607 dated 20.11.2015 under Sections 498-A/406/354A/377/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sarai Khawaja, District Faridabad, is quashed along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioner.

The petition stands disposed of.

12.05.2017 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2017.05.24 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh