Sunita v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024:PHHC:049488

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (134) CRWP-3277-2024 Date of Decision:-10.04.2024 Sunita ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****

Present:

Ms. Pinki Mehla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Brijesh Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

**** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus and for appointment of a Warrant Officer to search the detenue namely Monu (husband of the petitioner) from the illegal custody of respondent No. 4.

2.

After arguing vehemently on the merits of the case and not being able to demonstrate as to how the detenue is in illegal detention, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present case. 3.

Since the ingredients of maintainability of habeas petition are not met, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

(ALOK JAIN) JUDGE April 10, 2024 Parul Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No PARUL 2024.04.16 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document