Majid And ORS v. State Of Haryana




    
       Date of decision: 20th April, 2015  Majid and others  Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana  Respondent        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana with ASI Ramesh Chand.

 !
"#  $ Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.6 dated 08.01.2015 registered at Police Station Nagina, District Mewat under Sections 420, 407, 379, 411 & 1208B IPC. Vide order dated 02.02.2015 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioners were granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.04.28 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    Learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Ramesh Chand, submits that the petitioners have since joined the investigation and are no longer required for further investigation and nothing is to be recovered from them and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute.

In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 02.02.2015 is made absolute till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioners will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. With these observations, the present petition stands disposed off.

#  !
$   %&'( "    RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.04.28 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court