Manju Kumari And Another v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CRM-M No. 34029 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 34029 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.9.2017 ...

Manju Kumari and another ................Petitioners vs.

State of Haryana and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Petitioners in person with Mr. Ajay Arora, Advocate. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) It is contended that petitioner No.1 - Manju Kumari, aged more than 21 years has got married with petitioner No.2- Ravinder, aged more than 22 years, against the wishes of her father - Mange Ram, arrayed as private respondent No.4, who as per version of the petitioners is threatening to interfere in their marital life, therefore, they have approached this Court by way of filing the present petition. The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 - Superintendent of Police, District Sirsa, to look into the grievances of the petitioners and to take necessary measures to Banita Chugh 2017.09.13 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M No. 34029 of 2017 -2ensure that lives and liberty of the petitioners are not jeopardized at the hands of respondent No. 4 or persons claiming under him. However, this order shall not validate the marriage between the petitioners and shall not have any effect on any civil or criminal action to which the petitioners may be found liable, under the law. ( H.S. Madaan ) Judge 13.9.2017 chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2017.09.13 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh