Shubhdeep Singh Grewal v. State Of Punjab And Another
IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH ./.0 1 6 75 /'/0'.
./.0
'''
45
'''5 5 "+ !
!
"#$%& ' () *+& "+ ! $ * Mr. ( ) (* &
+'( ((, -$ $ * , ('
-../.0 (.&% !')
./.0 1 23 /&$ $%&
% 0) ) #
3( 4 8 &$%
560 1
119 #2 # # # 2 2 275 6 ) ! " .$% & $ & / & & $ $% & $ $% & $ $ %'& &' 5*
. * / / & '& * . . '& & *$
5 56.& $ $ & . )&
' 0
+.* && '*$%&$& $$.. & $% $% $* . .%) )& '0 . '%& / / . *$ $% * -' 1
+.* & &&$ .**. % :. $% & $ &'. .&&& &$
+ + '& $$ ( ( (* , -$ & $% $' '% '& & % $ &'
..%' & 5 & $$'
5* &$ * '& ;
< * $ $% & *&& $% ' &
& '
'
8 &' 5' &'&
'' $$ . & '
(' &. &= ='&$% *
$$. &.
. *$ $) *
&' ' 1#
($& . $ &$&' && &$ . '. &*% $ 4 & $ . . * &* 8
6 $& &Rohi 008 Crl. J. 2561. it Kumar Vs. State of Delhi : 20
&'& .* & ' . 4 1
1#
& && $ 1 1#
. ' & . '% & #1 % % &&$ + '. * &* 8
& . & '#1% $* ' &$&'
.'% 6 $&& Gurappa Gugal and others Vs.
Mysore : 1969 CriLJ 826 and State of M Shokat Ali Vs. State of Haryn na :
CR (Criminal) 339. 2020(2) R
9 (% *. '$* *. .. $* & & .'&
3(4 8 &$%
56 0 1
9 #2
# # # 2 2 275
6) ! " .$% & $ $ &' .& '
+.* & $
. & . ) $- & %$ %&& $ 2 # 0 5 $% &%$ & $ $ $ ' - % $- % $$&$%
..
0$* %&&$ $ $ $$ &'4& % $ 4& % & & ' $ & '
/ && & $
'%
0
5' &&&$ .& ' &$'
$'
' (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE /'/0'./.0
Yes/No Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whet ther reportable