Prashant Kumar v. State Of Haryana

CRM No.M-34032 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M- 34032 of 2017(O&M) Date of Decision: February 20 , 2018.

Parshant Kumar ...... PETITIONER (s)

Versus

State of Haryana and another ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present:

Mr. Mohan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok S.Chaudhary, Addl.AG, Haryana.

*****

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ***** LISA GILL, J.

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.454 dated 18.08.2017 under Sections 323/498A/506 IPC registered at Police Station Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar It is submitted that during the pendency of this petition, the matter has been amicably resolved between the parties on 01.12.2017 before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. Petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, it is informed, has been filed by the petitioner and respondent No.2. Statements of the parties at first motion have been recorded, part of the settled amount has been handed over to respondent No.2. Omkar Singh 2018.02.20 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-34032 of 2017 -2The petitioner undertakes to hand over the rest of the settled amount to respondent No.2 as well as abide by the terms and conditions of the settlement dated 01.12.2017. It is thus prayed that this petition be allowed. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Pritam Singh, verifies that the matter has indeed been settled between the parties. The petitioner is not reported to be involved in any other criminal case. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the petitioner is likely to abscond, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above, specifically the settlement arrived at between the parties but without commenting upon or expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is considered just and expedient to allow this petition. In the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. Petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Liberty is afforded to respondent No.2 to move an appropriate application in case the petitioner does not comply with the terms and conditions of the settlement.

( LISA GILL ) February 20 , 2018.

JUDGE 'om'

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Omkar Singh 2018.02.20 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh