Leela Devi And ANR. v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-34922-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.09-2017 Leela Devi and another ..... Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Amrit Lal, husband of petitioner No. 1-Leela Devi and father of petitioner No. 2-Rajiv Bansal, is present in person. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Randeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 4. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners have sought a direction to respondents No. 1 to 3 for restraining respondent No. 4, not to take any illegal action or not to harass/humiliate the petitioners unnecessarily on the complaint of respondent No. 4. Mr. Randeep Singh, Advocate has filed memo of appearance on behalf of respondent No. 4 in Court, which is taken on record. On instructions from ASI Jasvinder Singh, learned State counsel submits that the instant petition has rendered infructuous as the complaint moved by respondent No. 4 has been filed, being without any substance, as on asking, respondent No. 4 did not supply the relevant information.

In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.

September 08, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2017.09.11 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document