Sandeep Sharma v. Uhbvnl

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-9055-2026 Date of Decision: 25.03.2026 SANDEEP SHARMA

...Petitioner

Vs.

UHBVNL AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Manvender Chauhan, Advocate and Mr. Mohit Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of checking report dated 13.06.2018 and demand notices dated 14.06.2018 whereby respondent has raised demand of electricity charges of Rs.11,38,637/-. 2.

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that impugned order may be set aside with liberty to pass fresh order in view of judgment dated 13.03.2026 of this Court passed in CWP-35731-2025 titled as "Rattan Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Ors." 3.

Disposed of in terms of Rattan Singh (supra). (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE March 25, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.25 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document