Kulbir Singh And ORS. v. State Of Punjab And ANR.

CRM-M-34157-2014 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34157-2014 Date of Decision: February 08, 2016 Kulbir Singh and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Randeep Singh, Advocate for Mr.Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.K.S.Pannu, DAG, Punjab.

Ms.Loveleen Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondent No.2.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned proxy counsel for the petitioners submits that he has the instructions to state at Bar that learned trial Court has decided the case and, as such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Sukhwinder Singh, Police Station, Dera Baba Nanak, District Gurdaspur, also admits the fact that the case has been decided by learned trial Court.

MEENU 2016.02.10 12:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-34157-2014 -2Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has no objection to the withdrawal of the present petition.

So ordered.

February 08, 2016 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2016.02.10 12:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh