High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/35022/2016allowed

Jivtesh Singh Ahuja v. State Of U T Chandigarh

2017-03-17Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

CRM-M-35022-2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-35022-2016 Date of Decision:- 17.03.2017 Jivtesh Singh Ahuja ....Petitioner

Versus

State of U.T. Chandigarh ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Satnam Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Ashima Mor, Advocate for U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.S. Gulati, Advocate for the complainant.

Mr. H.S. Grewal, Advocate the Mediator.

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of FIR No.61 dated 02.08.2016, registered at Police Station Women Cell, Sector 17, Chandigarh, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC.

Vide order dated 19.10.2016, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre to enable the petitioner to settle the disputes with the Naresh Kumar 2017.03.24 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh complainant and the parties were directed to appear before the mediation

CRM-M-35022-2016 -2centre of this Court on 03.11.2016. As per the report of the mediator, the parties have not been able to resolve their disputes. Today again, an attempt was made to solve the disputes with the assistance of Mr. H.S. Grewal, Mediator, but in vain. In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 30.09.2016, passed by this Court whereby the ad-interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioner deposit a sum of `5 lacs in the shape of FDR in the name of complainant, before the trial Court, within a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

It is made clear that the decision with regard to release of the above-said amount will be seen by the trial Court at the final stage. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. March 17, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2017.03.24 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh