Rahul Sharma v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34192 of 2017 Date of Decision: 10.08.2018 Rahul Sharma ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - None for the petitioner.

Mr. Arjun Singh Yadav, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Davinder Kumar, Advocate, for Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate, for respondents No.5 and 6. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Baldev Singh, submits that instant petition has rendered infructuous in view of compromise between the parties.

Proxy counsel for respondents No.5 and 6 has produced affidavit of Rahul Sharma testifying that he does not want any action against the petitioner.

In view of above, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous and for want of prosecution as well. (RAMENDRA JAIN) August 10, 2018 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2018.08.14 11:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document