← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/3345/2026disposed of

Jarnail Singh And Other v. State Of Punjab And Others

2026-03-23Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh2 pages

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Writ Petition No. 3345 of 2026 Date of Decision: 23.03.2026 Jarnail Singh and Others ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh.

Present:

Mr. Imran Farooqi, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. I.P.S.Sabharwal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

Surya Partap Singh, J.

1.

The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for directions to the respondents No.2 to protect his life and liberty from the respondents No. 3. to 5.

2.

The learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed a representation dated 16.03.2026 (Annexure P1) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel for the petitioners prays for directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the above mentioned representation within a stipulated time.

3.

Notice of motion to the respondents.

4.

Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. I.P.S.Sabharwal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Hence, service of notice upon the respondents is DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.03.24 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Writ Petition No. 3345 of 2026 hereby dispensed with.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for disposing of the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P1) be given to the respondent No.2 and that the instant writ petition be disposed of accordingly.

7.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P1) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner and take an independent decision at his own level.

(Surya Partap Singh) Judge March 23, 2026 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.03.24 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document