Sanjeet @ Sanjay v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M No. 34294 of 2017 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 34294 of 2017 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION :- November 28, 2017 Sanjeet @ Sanjay

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. J.P. Jangu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana *** CRM No. 38235 of 2017 This is an application for placing on record amended petition. Heard.

The application is allowed.

CRM-M No. 34294 of 2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has since joined the investigation and has furnished an affidavit that he does not hold any Passport. This fact is conceded by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Narinder Singh from Police Station Khol, District Rewari. Only during the trial it can be established as to whether offence under Section 3(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is made out.

Learned State counsel submits that that the petitioner is not Parvinder Singh 2017.11.28 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 34294 of 2017 (O&M) required by the police for further investigation. Therefore, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 14.9.2017 is made absolute, subject to his fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE November 28, 2017 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2017.11.28 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh