Darshan Lal v. State Of Punjab




    
     

 Date of decision: 18th March, 2015  Darshan Lal  Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab  Respondent     !"  #
  #
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. S.K. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab with HC Kuldeep Singh.



 #
$

" Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.19 dated 28.06.2014 registered at Police Station Narot Jaimal Singh, District Pathankot under Sections 4989A/406/323/34 IPC. Vide order dated 19.11.2014 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioner was granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer.
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.19 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

  Learned State Counsel, on instructions from HC Kuldeep Singh, submits that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation and nothing is to be recovered from him and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute.

In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 19.11.2014 is made absolute till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. With these observations, the present petition stands disposed off.

 #
   %&'( )$ *  RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.19 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court