Monika Malik And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CRM-M-3432-2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3432 of 2017 Date of decision : 02.02.2017 Monika Malik and another ... Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Petitioners in person with Mr. Kapil Khanna, Advocate.

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) This petition is for seeking protection of life and liberty of petitioners, who alleged to have married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 to 7.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his prayer for taking appropriate action in accordance with law on the representation dated 30.01.2017 (Annexure P-4) made by the petitioners. It has been stated that both the petitioners are major. The date of birth of petitioner No.1-Monika Malik is 26.06.1998 as per copy of Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-1) and that of petitioner No.2-Parvinder Singh is 31.03.1995 as per copy of Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-2). They got married on 30.01.2017. Photographs of marriage are Annexure P-3.

In view of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, but without expressing any opinion on the validity of marriage of petitioners, petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2Superintendent of Police, Panchkula to look into the representation dated 30.01.2017 (Annexure P-4) and take appropriate action in accordance with law, on receipt of copy of this order along with representation in his office. Jitender Kumar 2017.02.03 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-3432-2017 -2However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them. February 02, 2017 (SURINDER GUPTA) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.02.03 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH