Manjit Kaur v. State Of Haryana & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 240 Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-34357 of 2015 (O & M) Date of Decision: May 05, 2016 Manjit Kaur ..... PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Haryana & others ..... RESPONDENTS . . .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH . . .

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? . . .

PRESENT: - None for the petitioner.

Mr. S.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. . . .

Jaspal Singh, J (Oral) 1.

This is a petition preferred by Manjit Kaur under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking directions to respondent Nos.4 and 5 to make investigation in FIR No.147 dated April 11, 2014 under Sections 406, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station, Safidon, District Jind (Annexure P-1) registered against Sher Singh and another, and after completion thereof, to put up challan against them.

Crl. Misc. No.M-34357 of 2015 [2] 2.

In response to notice of motion issued by this Court, State preferred reply by way of affidavit of Harinder Kumar, DSP, Safidon, District Jind. Though an adjournment has been sought vide adjournment slip but this matter can be disposed of keeping in view the reply filed by the State.

3.

A glance at the reply transpires that investigation in this case has been conducted and no evidence came on record to support the allegations unfolded in the FIR No.147 dated April 11, 2014 under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station, Safidon, with regard to making of any payment at Safidon. Moreover, on the same set of allegations, another FIR has also been got registered by the petitioner bearing FIR No.163 dated January 4, 2012 under Sections 419, 420, 120-B IPC read with Section 12 of the Passport Act, Police Station, Sadar Patiala (Punjab) which is still under investigation. In the above referred FIR registered at Police Station, Safidon, after investigation, cancellation report has been prepared and presented in the jurisdictional court on March 3, 2016.

4.

In view of cancellation report and its presentation in the court, instant petition has rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. However, petitioner shall be at liberty to have recourse to other remedies available to him under law.

(Jaspal Singh) May 05, 2016 Judge avin

Crl. Misc. No.M-34357 of 2015 [3]