Shiwani & ANR v. State Of Haryana & ORS

CRM-M-34456-2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34456-2015 Date of Decision: January 25, 2016 Shiwani and another .....Petitioners

Versus

The State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.G.S.Guri, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Apoorv Garg, DAG, Haryana.

Mr.Bhavnik Mehta, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 to 6.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC Rajeev, Police Station, Ambala City, submits that petitioner No.1 has suffered her statement that she has no threat to her life from the private respondents.

Mr.Bhavnik Mehta, Advocate, representing the private MEENU 2016.01.27 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-34456-2015 -2respondents also submits that during pendency of the present petition, the private respondents have reconciled their dispute and have no objection with the marriage performed by the petitioners.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this petition, at this stage. So ordered.

January 25, 2016 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2016.01.27 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh