Azad v. State Of Haryana And Another
CRM-M-19716-2022
!"#"
$%&'(&)(&'
% *+ ( ,- ,( .
! " #$ %
& '
()*# "+ ,,,,, - ,( ./( 01 - ./ $
/ *
0123 3
4
(5
( ! (
26702722
8 -7 / 3
/ "
$
* 9 # +
(:
** /4
(
(
%*
(: /
/
!
%/
(;
2<- 27-=# 3> ;
20?5-=# * @ A
;(
/*> % #-11-#
* / %
/ : $
%
* :
#$
2772272B 2 ) ! : '
%
767?2722# *
%
*
/*
/!
/
( + $
# *'
# ;: "*
!
2
* > :%
/
'
:
# %
$ *
*# !
A *
+
%
4
*
% $ **(
> : (
:
%
% * #
% *
/ * $
(# : % * ! *
*
(
!
B C
%
*
%
! / %
/ :
!
* / /
%
> /!
%
* ! ! /
*3
%
! # !
%
;(
/*> % #-11-/ !
:
$
2772272B/ 9 - 3*#+ *
%%
2772272B 0 >
/!
#*
%
*
*% * %
/%
D 3
%
# /!
%
%*
% *:
? > %* / : $
(
(%4 !
* / *$#
! % # !
:
/
* %
!*
2772272B# *
%/ $
B
< >
!""
##$#%
D
* "Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No. 64 dated 15.02.2017 filed under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station Sector-5, Panchkula and all other subsequent proceedings arising thereof as well as order dated 24.10.2016 passed by the trial Court vide which a direction was issued to register the aforesaid FIR.
xxxxxxx Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the decisions rendered by this Court in "Vikas Sharma vs. Gurpreet Singh Kohli and another (supra), 2017, (3) L.A.R.584, Microqual Techno Limited and others Vs. State of Haryana and another, 2015 (32) RCR (Crl.) 790 and "Rajneesh Khanna Vs. State of Haryana and another" 2017(3) L.A.R. 555 wherein in an identical circumstance, this Court has held that since the main petition filed under Section 138 of the Act stands withdrawn in view of an amicable settlement between the parties, therefore, continuation of proceedings under Section 174A of IPC shall be nothing but an abuse of the process of law.
xxxxxx In view of the same, I find merit in the present petition and accordingly, present petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 24.10.2016 passed by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Panchkula as well as FIR No.64 dated 15.02.2017 registered under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Sector-5, Panchkula and all other subsequent proceedings arising thereof, are hereby quashed." = * / $ :
* :
* % : E> : (
>3
0
/ .
* 3
(
-B1 ;(
/* > % # -11-# : * %*
(
! # %
D % *
(
$
/ $
% !
% :
$ : !
%/* *! / :
#
(
>3
( / /
% *: . % :
!
** :
(
(
!
:**4
E> %
-=0 >3 1
%
D 3
% * %&
!$ ! ' $"
* * "No doubt, the learned counsel for the respondent has vehemently argued that the offence under Section 174A I.P.C. is independent of the main case, therefore, merely because the main case has been dismissed for want of prosecution, the present petition cannot be allowed, however, keeping in view the fact that the present FIR was registered only on account of absence from the proceedings in the main case which had been subsequently regularised by the court while granting bail to the petitioner, the default stood condoned. In such circumstances, continuation of proceedings under Section 174A I.P.C. Shall be abuse of the process of court.
Accordingly, the petition is allowed. FIR No.446 dated 21.08.2017, registered under Section 174A I.P.C. At Police Station Kotwali, District Faridabad, as well as consequential proceedings shall stand quashed."
?
6
( !
*#
% !
$#%
(
-=0 >3: * //
% *:#
%!
/ :
-7 %
% ! %#
% $ %
% %
-B1 ;(
/* > % # -11-# * (
:
/ %
#%
(
>3# -1<7#
( / /
% *: -- %%
(*#
)
26702722
8 -7 / 3
/ "
$
9 #+ ** /4
(
(
(:
** /4
(!
(
!# 4 4
- ,( . &'(&)(&' ) '
(5
F5;
)
/* F5;