← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaRFA/4092/2003disposed of

State Of Punjab v. Sadhu Singh

2016-07-213 pages

RFA No. 4092 of 2003 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

RFA No. 4092 of 2003 Date of Decision: 21.07.2016 State of Punjab ..Appellant versus Sadhu Singh ..Respondent RFA No.4095 of 2003 State of Punjab ..Appellant versus Bachan Singh ..Respondent RFA No.4101 of 2003 State of Punjab .. Appellant versus Rulia ..Respondent RFA No.4103 of 2003 State of Punjab ..Appellant versus Bachan Singh ..Respondent RFA No.4104 of 2003 State of Punjab ..Appellant versus Rajinder Singh and another ..Respondents

RFA No. 4092 of 2003 2 RFA No.4178 of 2003 The State of Punjab ..Appellant versus Amrik Singh and others ..Respondents RFA No.2001 of 2004 The Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Development, Punjab,SAS Nagar ..Appellant versus Surjit Singh and others ..Respondents and RFA No.2004 of 2004 Land Acquisition Collector, PUDA ..Appellant versus Babu Singh and others ..Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

Present:

Mr. K.K.Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the appellants.

-.- 1.

Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ARUN PALLI, J. (ORAL) This order shall decide Regular First Appeals Nos. 4092, 4095, 4101, 4103, 4104, 4178 of 2003, 2001 and 2004 of 2004.

RFA No. 4092 of 2003 3 Learned State counsel points out at the out-set that in the wake of the judgment of this court, dated 28.1.2013, in RFA No.4129 of 2003, "Surinder Rani and others versus State of Punjab" and subsequently, of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos.7686-7687 of 2014 "Parkash Wati and others etc. vs. State of Punjab and others", all these appeals shall have to be dismissed Ordered accordingly.

21.07.2016 ( ARUN PALLI) VK JUDGE