Surjit Singh And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ANR
! Date of decision: 20th July, 2015 Surjit Singh and others
Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
Respondents " #$ % % 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
Mr. J.S. Bhinder, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab with ASI Mohinderjit Singh.
None for the remaining respondents.
%& $! Learned State counsel has placed on record report by way of affidavit of Jagatpreet Singh, PPS, Dy. Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Sunam, District Sangrur along with death certificates of Bhupinder Singh and Madan Lal, and statement of clerk from the office of Civil Surgeon, Sangrur and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala in this regard.
Report dated 04.05.2015 of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sunam (Sangrur) has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Surjit Singh son of Puran Singh, RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.21 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
Jarnail Singh, Jaswinder Singh and Gurjant Singh and the accused persons namely Surjit Singh son of Madan Lal, Gurmail Singh, Ram Dev, Parvinder Singh and Harwinderpal Singh son of Jagdish Ram, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.
Heard.
In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a case of version and cross6version, the fact that parties belong to the same area and the offences for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in resolving the personal dispute and in bringing about peace and harmony and in view of the law laid down in '()* %(*+,-%.)./ 0*1)2)*3)*.,/4#
5! 4(6(*)7!5 and '8079(*3/4%(*+,)*3.,/4:-%.)./ 0*1)2)*3)*.,/4#
! 4(6(*)7!
& the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of Rapat No.37 arising out of FIR No.85 dated 02.06.2010 registered at Police Station Sunam, District Sangrur under Sections 341/355/506/148/149/323/325 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.
%! 07;
&
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.21 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court