Anita v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RFA No.1289 of 2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.09.2022 Anita ..Appellant (s)

Versus

State of Haryana and ors.

..Respondent (s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL PresentMr. Daljit Singh Virk, Advocate, Mr. Arpandeep Narula, Advocate, Mr. Dheeraj Naruja, Advocate, Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Jain,Advocate, Mr. Deepak Jain, Advocate, Mr. Akshay Jain, Advocate, Mr. Munish Kamboj, Advocate, Mr. Manvinder S. Sidhu, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate, Mr. Ashok Verma, Advocate, Mr. Satbir Singh Gill, Advocate, Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate, Mr. Labhan Paul, Advocate for Mr. Jagjit Singh Gill, Advocate, Mr. Kartar Singh, Advocate, Mr. M.M Pandey, Advocate, Mr. Sushil K. Verma, Advocate, Mr. Lal Singh Sandhu, Advocate, Mr. Mandeep Sandhu, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the landowners. Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana.

*** ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

CM No.2831-CI of 2021 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 690 days in refiling the appeal is condoned. CM No.2833-CI of 2021 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 95 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Main Case For orders, see detailed order of the even date passed in RFA No.4227 of 2019 titled as Sukhdev vs. State of Haryana and anr. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.

07.09.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) ashok JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No ASHOK KUMAR 2022.09.17 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document