Naveen v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-34558 of 2015 Date of decision: 31.03.2016 Naveen ..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ..Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? Yes/No
2. To be referred to reporters or not? Yes/No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No
Present:
Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, AAG, Haryana for the respondent - State.
Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for the complainant.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Both the parties are present in the Court and submit that they are residing together and are happy in their matrimonial life. Accordingly, interim order dated 17.11.2015 passed by this Court made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
31.03.2016 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE NEETU RANI 2016.04.01 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh