High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/34611/2015dismissed

Dharambir Singh v. State Of Haryana

2016-03-21Mr. Justice S.P. Bangarh2 pages

CRM-M 34611/2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:21.03.2016 Dharambir Singh .............Petitioner v.

State of Haryana .............Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.Pulkit Dagar,Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Kuldip Tiwari,Addl.AG Haryana Jaswant Singh,J.(Oral) Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.685 dated 28.7.2015 under Sections 406,420,467,468, 471,120-B IPC, PS Sector Gurgaon Sadar,Distt.Gurgaon.

Petitioner is Managing Director of a Real Estate Developer Company (Aryan Earth Infrastructure Limited) who had offered to sell flats through another broker company under the name of KST Land Traders Private Limited. The allegations against the petitioner are that after obtaining a fake permission letter from the Municipal Corporation, Gurgaon and on its basis duped other persons while collecting huge amount of money from the investors. The alleged licence obtained from the Municipal Corporation,Gurgaon was found RAJINDER PRASHAD JOSHI 2016.03.21 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh.

CRM-M 34611/2015 to be fake and other FIRs have been registered on similar allegations. This Court had granted interim protection and permitted petitioner to join investigation on one of the pleas that he was ready and willing to return the amount to investors. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount due to the complainant stands paid, but learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Surjit Singh submits that inspite of repeated directions by this Court the petitioner has failed to join investigation and cooperate for completing the investigation. In response,learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has also intimated his client in that regard on a number of occasions and is thus unable to respond to this factual aspect submitted by the learned State counsel.

Keeping in view the nature of the allegations and the fact that the petitioner has failed to join investigation, no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out.

Dismissed.

21.03.2016 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge RAJINDER PRASHAD JOSHI 2016.03.21 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh.