← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/16174/2026allowed

Daljit Singh Alias Kaka v. State Of Punjab

2026-04-09Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal4 pages

CRM-M-16174-202 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.247 CRM-M-16174-2026 Decided on : 09.04.2026 Daljit Singh alias Kaka ...... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM : 

   *** Present :

Mr. Gaurav Kalsi, Advocate for the petitioner.



  ***    , J (ORAL)       



  !"

#$

 

 

 

        

     %&  $ !'  

()*+)+(





 (,+-") ",(-

#$ +)+"

  +(

  . *(*  

 /00  . + #

    %&1



 

2   1

1 3

.

1

,0- 

 .

 

("!!43 ..     

1 .

 %& "







 

. 

6

CRM-M-16174-202 2





 

 



 1   

 6



 

 

)!)*+)+( %&1



()*+)+(    7 



)!   

    5 





%& 0     

 

 

/ 





1

. 3

  

.

/

 

 +()+)+(6

 . 3

   

 





 8 



))++)+9

 833'"+ )3+)+(  /       



   

5  . 

  

.

  1

0 

.





 1

 

0

 .  /

 

 







  

1

  1 0 

5   .

 

   

 .  

..



      He further submits that the petitioner is involved in one other case of similar nature meaning thereby he is a habitual offender.

( 5

  

  

 



 



 .

 )(.

 )' : 3

 

 





 :    

CRM-M-16174-202 3

:

  



   .



 1

0 

.





 1

 



  .   

  5 

 1 

  



  1





 



+

8 

&  9 

 

 

.

 

 

    

  

   

  1  5 ;

 78 

0

  .

 



  



 

  

.

   

.

 

  





+

8 

 &        

   

 

 

 

'   

    .



 

 

   4   ,-







.



5 <

 .

8  !" !  

 #       $  

 1

 . 

  

1

     

   



 

   4   ,- / 

  

 

.

 

 3

1=3 "As observed by the High Court, merely on the basis of criminal antecedents, the claim of the second respondent cannot be rejected. In other words, it is the duty of the Court to find out the role of the accused in the case in which he has been charged and other circumstances such as possibility of fleeing away from the jurisdiction of the Court etc."

CRM-M-16174-202 4  ! &  1

   

   

     



        

4   

       

 

   8 4   482

& 

  

 



  7 

  .



* 

 

     

       ..

 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No >   

=?

4$