Sudhir Kumar v. Union Of India And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH


CWP No.8135 of 2023 Date of Decision:04.01.2024 Sudhir Kumar ....Petitioner vs.

Union of India and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr.Anil Mehta, Advocate and Ms. Sukriti Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Neha Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel for Mr. Amit Sharma,Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G.Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent No. 2 to re-issue him passport.

2.

Learned counsel for respondents-Union of India submits that application of the petitioner has already been closed and if petitioner files a fresh application, it would be decided considering judgment of this Court in Mohan Lal @ Mohna vs. Union of India and others 2023 SCC Online P&H 1391 as well as the Passport Act and rules made thereunder. 3.

In the wake of statement of learned counsel for Union of India, the petition stands disposed of.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 04.01.2024 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.01.04 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment