High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/35689/2018dismissed

Satnam Singh v. State Of Punjab

2018-08-20Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-35689 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 20, 2018 Satnam Singh

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.B.B.S.Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.64 dated 18.06.2018 under Sections 323, 324, 326, 148 and 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Sri Hargobindpur, District Gurdaspur.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.

From the record, I find that present petitioner is named in the FIR. He was stated to be armed with datar and he gave blow on the head of the complainant, which injury has been declared as grievous. Though, it is a case of version and cross-version but keeping in view the fact that present petitioner is the main accused and weapon is still to be recovered, I find that petitioner is required for custodial interrogation. VINEET GULATI 2018.08.21 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh Otherwise also, in view of the nature and gravity of the offence, I do not

CRM No.M-35689 of 2018 -2find any ground to grant benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

August 20, 2018 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2018.08.21 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh