Amit Samuel @ Neela @ Amit v. State Of Punjab

1-

  
       
  





!"

# $%&%!'( ) ) *% *, - .

.

*% )))  %%!' / 0 /&,&

!"

,'1 )))  &3!'# '



 45 

!"

# $%&%!'( ) ) /%6%3 +%'76 .

/%6% )))  %%!' / 0 /&,&

!"

,'1 )))  &3!'# '

(  89 ) +
 +0 +9


         

 

 !"!"#

$

        

 !!% &!"!

#

 ' () (*
$

+0 +9:

)

9

, $   +  $'  ' $   &  

,  -))  


 



    

    




 !"

 



# $ 

%#     



 +    $     ./

      $ 0' '   '$)  + )  ./ 1

"   "

!"

& $  !!   1  ($' 
2 $+   &3  

24 1(
5# ' 
) 



 ( ) 

   $   ./  ' -   -   -  ))' -    $

)

' 7
 -  '       33" '   8 -   -) 

$) - -    ' -  $  +    "" '   8 9   -

  "

!"

&

$)      $'  $
 ) ' 7
  ) )  2$ )   ) )  2 -       +  ))2     ./

/   + '$  +   - 0 $  ()  )+ )2 )   $  1(
 , $+         )  )   ) $ +2 ,))
) :

 ;

 )  -         ))   - 2  () +$   - 2 + 0   - )  )     2 -  2     -    ' $'  ,))
) :

-$  2  ))

$)   $

$) 7 1) 7        -  )     ' '

  $  1(
   -  '   2 + ) +2  $ -   $) '

$
 ) ' 7
   $+    -     $     ' '

     $  1(
 +$    <$  ))  

$) $+    '

 <$    )

3-  ))    +  +$   )   ''      + ) '  + )

='   )   $) $ $   / ( ) ' $+           )) -  +   ) <$ 2      $ $     1(
 '  

           )  '   + )

   $  ))    +   !

!"!"  '  +    !3 !"!

  $    $ -      ))  $) + >  $    $'   $ $    

/      ) $+    

1'  '      1(
  8?+) $ $  Union of India Vs. K.A.Najeeb 2021 (2) RCR (Criminal) 145,   +  $ "16. This Court has clarified in numerous judgments that the liberty guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution would cover within its protective ambit not only due procedure and fairness but also access to justice and a speedy trial. In Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee Representing Undertrial Prisoners v. Union of India, (1994) 6 SCC 731, it was held that undertrials cannot indefinitely be detained pending trial. Ideally, no person ought to suffer adverse consequences of his acts unless the same is established before a neutral arbiter. However, owing to the practicalities of real life where to secure an effective trial and to ameliorate the risk to society in case a potential criminal is left at large pending trial, Courts are tasked with deciding whether an individual ought to be released pending trial or not. Once it is obvious that a timely trial would not be possible and the accused has suffered

4incarceration for a significant period of time, Courts would ordinarily be obligated to enlarge them on bail."

;'     )2      $      $ 
      '  $2    - +2 -  ) "! 2   )) )0)   )2 )$   )    )     '$)  + )

@$ ' $      

'$  +2  $)        ))-

    )2 *% *, - .

.

*%

'# /%6%3 +%'76 .

/%6%    + )   + )   $'

<$  + )A$2 +          ) $A($2

' 

/  )   2 +     +  ))  + $  + )         

+0 +9



!"!



@  0'A   BA1 @  +) BA1