Parveen Kumar v. State Of Punjab

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-35766-2016 Date of Decision: February 03, 2017 Parveen Kumar .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.H.S.Gill, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms.Reeta Kohli, Addl.A.G.,Punjab with Mr.Hanspal Virk, AAG, Punjab.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

Having regard to the stand taken by the learned State counsel that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined and even accused have already examined five defence witnesses and two more witnesses are likely to be examined today and thus, only four defence witnesses are left to be examined, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition at this stage as the trial is likely to be concluded very shortly. Ordered accordingly.

However, in the event of any further delay, petitioner is at liberty to file fresh petition.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE February 03, 2017 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.02.08 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh