Hans Raj v. State Of Punjab

Crl. Misc. No. M-35887 of 2018 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-35887 of 2018 Date of Decision: 21.9.2018 Hans Raj ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. G.S.Madaan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Jagmohan Ghumman, DAG, Punjab.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No. 14 dated 22.4.2018 registered at Police Station Narot Jaimal Singh, District Pathankot, under Section 304-B IPC.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner is the maternal grandfather of the husband of the deceased and the parents of Rahul were not alive and the couple were staying in his house and he is 73 years old. The counsel further submits that investigation is over and challan has been presented. He also submits that initially the complainant did not make a statement to the police as he wanted to consult his family and the husband of the deceased was arrested in July 2018. The petitioner is 73 years old. He is the maternal grandfather of Rahul.

Without commenting anything on the merits of the case and considering the age of the petitioner, the petition is allowed and the GURPREET SINGH 2018.09.24 12:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-35887 of 2018 -2petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. (ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE September 21, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No GURPREET SINGH 2018.09.24 12:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh