Santosh Kumari And ORS v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 10667 of 2019 Date of Decision: April 05 , 2022.

Santosh Kumari and others ...... PETITIONER (s)

Versus

State of Punjab and others ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present:

Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Gurbachan Singh Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Sunint Kaur, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. R.S.Kalra, Advocate for respondents No.6 and 7.

*****

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ***** LISA GILL, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are satisfied with the refixation of the pension which has since been carried out, therefore, this writ petition is rendered infructuous. Disposed of accordingly.

( LISA GILL ) April 05 , 2022.

JUDGE 'om'

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No OMKAR SINGH 2022.04.07 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh