← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/16202/2026allowed

Santosh Pandey v. State Of Haryana And Another

2026-04-27Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-16202-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.04.2026 Santosh Pandey ..... Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana & Anr.

..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH

Present:

Mr. Rakesh Chahar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana assisted by ASI Anshul.

***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral) This petition for pre-arrest bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of 'the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023'. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.288 dated 29.10.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 340, 61 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Sarai Khawaja, District Faridabad.

2.

Vide order dated 24.03.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation.

GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.27 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

3.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 24.03.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

4.

The learned State Counsel has already filed status report. The same be taken on record. The learned State Counsel, on the instructions of ASI Anshul, has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required.

5.

Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled for anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 24.03.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 27.04.2026 Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.27 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document