Veena Aggarwal v. Chandan Munjal

Crl. Misc.-M No. 37788 of 2013 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc.-M No. 37788 of 2013 Date of Decision: 10.9.2015.

Veena Aggarwal .....Petitioner

Versus

Chandan Munjal .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the respondent.

**** SABINA, J.

Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner to take up all the pleas available to her before the Trial Court during trial .

Dismissed as withdrawn.

However, personal appearance of the petitioner before the Trial Court, during trial, shall remain exempted subject to the following conditions:- i.

petitioner shall be represented through counsel; ii.

shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings;

iii.

shall not dispute her identity as an accused; iv.

shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in her absence but in the presence of her counsel;

GURPREET SINGH 2015.09.11 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Crl. Misc.-M No. 37788 of 2013 -2v.

shall appear before the Trial Court as and when required by the Trial Court;

vi.

any other condition which the learned Trial Court may impose.

(SABINA) JUDGE September 10, 2015 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2015.09.11 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document