Sandeep Singh @ Bhima v. State Of Punjab
!" "#$%$&' ()
* &+"",*$&-./ .$0 "!$!$&"1 2"1%3% *! !" 3&4 5 "%,&+"&!
'6 7** * 1"%"&!
* * 8 ! " ""
$%& '( #)* +
+" ,-,&.! " " "
" * /0 )11$
,2-2,-,3
44 "" "
",,5,25615%3) *" 7 "#
" " 12%3 8 " 9" ,
/04 * " ' *.
,2-2,-,3 " * "
*
# " ""
" ""
# * : * 54
" "
"
4 "'4 *. #"
4
""
" ""
"" ,- ; * "'< =4.
* *&1,*4" & " "
"
#
> " 4 " * "
= "
*
" * /0 4 "
4
" * + $ "
" *
* " *
" *
"
" 4
"
4
3 !$#" 0!$& 6
" #
"
"
"
5
"
" # " "
!
"
"
# ! + )4 #"
9
"
"#"
? % !
* 5" " #
'@ # *@"!
9#. ,-,& 88
8 1,&3
" " 4 # " 4
" # " "" 5
9 2
4 # '
A 4A@" *
0
* .,-1% & 88 8?3?
"
" 5
" 4 "" * "
" " ""
"
* "
1-
4 "
#
8 '
A4@" .
,-1% $ 080
8 4 2&% "
"
#* " "4+ *
* " 5
11 '! *@" !4 )
.
,-,1 $ 881" "
"" "
6?)
4
" "" 1, "
# 1& If the facts and circumstances of the present case are analyzed in the light of above-mentioned principles of law, it transpires that:- " # # " ;
4" #
#"B #
" * ** # * " " " 5
">
" 4+ *
#7 4 "" #
"
)
" "
"
#
" # 4 *4 " # "+
" " #
5,& ( # +"# #4B * "
4 ""
""
*"
5&?)
>
B ""
" + #
+5 " + # # "
" * " "
4#4
""
"B " * " "
5 C 1$ "
" #
'4 " D
" .
,-1% & 88,, "
E " 4 "
" 4
4 * # " "
* #9 " " 4 "
* "4 " " "
4 "
4 " " "F 4 4 "
"
* " * * " " 4 ; "" 4# " "
; D # "4 " "
"" * 4 4 "" *
* "! " " #* 4 "
" #! " *
" # "
* "
*"
"
;
"
" "
4"
#* 4
" "
# "8 # #9 *8 #F " # " "" # "
# *
" " * * " 4" " "
G 13 " #
'
A 4 8 ( " * .
,-,, 1- 8831 " ""
"
E 4 "
" "
#"4# " " " *" 4
8
* " * "
"
8 " + "" # * # "
" # # * "H 4 ;
"
" ""
## # 4 >
# "
* " G 16 # "
'!" A 4 @" 8 "*.
,-,3 88 8&,,
""
E
"* " ;"
# " "
"
#
" " * "
#
,1 8" "
*
G""
E
#"
; # 4"
" #
# " "#" "
:
* " 4" " 8 4"
8 4
"4#" :
* "
"
"
"
#G 1? ! "8 "" " "
*"
# " "
"
"
,1 8" ! " " *
" "
4
#9. ; '(
* " .,-,$ 88 8$&3$ 1% !+ * "
"
"
" # "
""
"
:
12 *# 44 *# * 4 "
"
" # ;;<"+! " #
"
" * " "
#
"
" "
8 9 " "
* "5 " # #4+ #
4 "
# ">
"
"" ""
44 "" *"
" # #B " 4 ;
"
""
" # *
"" 8
" B
" 4 "" 8 ,- "
4
#"
4
"# "
* "
* 4 " * *
()
H " + *C "
"C) H
"C)