Jainab & ANR v. State Of Punjab

Crl. Misc. No. M-35959 of 2016 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-35959 of 2016 Date of Decision: 07.12.2016 Jainab and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. V.P.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 35 dated 5.6.2016, registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 324, 506, 120-B IPC, Police Station City Ahmedgarh, District Sangrur.

Counsel for the petitioners states that the allegations against the petitioners were that they had caught hold of the legs of the complainant. He further states that Section 307 IPC has been deleted. Counsel further states that pursuant to the order dated 7.10.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioners have joined the investigation.

State counsel submits that the complaint has been given by the complainant and the matter is being investigated against the petitioners. He further states that the petitioners have joined the investigation. Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.07 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-35959 of 2016 -2merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 7.10.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioners is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE December 07, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.07 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh