Bhim Sain Garg v. State Of Haryana And ANR

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-35987 of 2016 Date of Decision: 07.12.2016 Bhim Sain Garg ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 389 dated 1.7.2016, registered under Sections 323, 328, 498-A, 506 IPC, Police Station Mujesar, District Faridabad.

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 7.10.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 7.10.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE December 07, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.07 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh