Sunder Pal And Another v. Harmal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR-2764-2023 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.04.2025 Sunder Pal and Another ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Harmal

...Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Akshay Kumar Goel, Advocate for the respondent. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. 2.

Learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that the present revision petition has been filed challenging an order dated 29.03.2023 whereby an application filed by the petitioners herein under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC for rejection of the plaint was dismissed. During the interregnum, the main civil suit being Civil Suit No.69 of 2021 itself stands decreed vide judgment and decree dated 24.03.2025 and hence the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous. 3.

In view of the above, the present revision petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to revive in case anything survives in the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 30.04.2025 (ALKA SARIN) Ankur JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO Ankur Goyal 2025.05.01 08:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document