Sanjay v. Hukam Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

**** CM-12538-CII-2026 in/and CR-2743-2026 Date of decision: 02.07.2026 Sanjay . . . . Petitioner Vs.

Hukam Singh . . . . Respondent ****

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA **** Present: - Mr.Rajesh Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) CM-12538-CII-2026 This is an application under Section 151 CPC to place on record documents Annexures P5 to P7.

Application is allowed.

Annexures P5 to P7 are taken on record.

CR-2743-2026 Perusal of Annexure P7 would reveal that in RSA-2713-2019 titled Om Parkash Jain Vs. Hukam Singh and another, this Court had directed the parties to maintain status quo in respect of the disputed property. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as far as the present case is concerned, petitioner is not a party to the litigation between Om Parkash Jain and Hukam Singh. However, it is conceded by learned counsel, as was also conceded before the Trial Court that property in both the litigations is the same. Once it is so, the trial Court concerned has rightly VIVEK PAHWA 2026.07.02 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CM-12538-CII-2026 in/and 2026:PHHC:089156 CR-2743-2026 observed that he is unable to proceed further till further directions of this Court are received in RSA-2713-2019.

Faced with the aforesaid situation, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move an appropriate application before the executive/trial Court for refund of the amount as deposited by the petitioner, in accordance with law. In view of the aforesaid statement, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. In case any such application is moved, the trial Court shall dispose of the same in accordance with law.

(DEEPAK GUPTA) 02.07.2026 JUDGE Vivek Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VIVEK PAHWA 2026.07.02 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document