Harbanso Etc. v. State Of Punjab Etc.

CRR-1942-2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 202/1 CRR-1942-2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 Harbanso and another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate for respondent No.4.

**** RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI , J.(Oral) 1.

Registry has reported that the petitioner No.2 has been intimated by his granddaughter to have expired and respondents No.2 and 3 have also expired. The death certificates of respondents No.2 and 3 have been attached with the file. As per it, respondent No.2-Rajinder Singh expired on 13.12.2023 whereas respondent No.3-Kashmir Singh expired on 09.01.2025. The respondent No.4-Satnam Singh, as is evident from the judgments passed by the Courts concerned, was declared as a proclaimed offender and was not convicted by the impugned judgment/s and order of sentence.

2.

In view thereof, the present petition qua respondent No.4Satnam Singh was/is not maintainable. Therefore, for the purpose of law, the present petition has to be treated as a petition against the respondents No.2 and 3 only. Since they have been reported to have expired, it, therefore, is RAJEEV PUROHIT 2026.05.26 18:28 I am approving this document

CRR-1942-2008 disposed of as abated.

3.

Pending application(s), if any, is/are also disposed of. 26.05.2026 (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) Rajeev (rvs) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No RAJEEV PUROHIT 2026.05.26 18:28 I am approving this document