Prakash v. State Of Haryana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-9142-2026 Date of Decision: 25.03.2026 PRAKASH ALIAS PARKASH

...Petitioner

Vs.

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Rishab Jalhotra, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.1 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of assessment order dated 13.02.2018 whereby respondent has raised demand of electricity charges of Rs.4,67,641/- and compounding notice dated 13.02.2018 whereby respondent has proposed compounding fee 2.

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that impugned order may be set aside with liberty to pass fresh order in view of judgment dated 13.03.2026 of this Court passed in CWP-35731-2025 titled as "Rattan Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Ors." 3.

Disposed of in terms of Rattan Singh (supra). (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE March 25, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.25 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document