← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/9515/2020dismissed

Jai Hind Cooperative Transport Society Ltd. v. State Of Haryana And Others

2021-03-05Mr. Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu2 pages

CWP-9515-2020 -1215-16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9515 of 2020(O&M) Date of decision: March 05, 2021 The Jai Hind Cooperative Transport Society Ltd., Hisar .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, A.A.G. Haryana Mr. Inder Pal Goyat, Advocate for respondents No.5, 6, 9 & 10.

***** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J Present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction for quashing the impugned orders/permits bearing Nos. (i) HR2020-SC-0111A dated 13.04.2020 (Route No.17 i.e Hansi to Julana); (ii) HR2020-SC-0105A dated 13.04.2020 (Route No.17 i.e Hansi to Julana); (iii) HR2020-SC-0120A dated 13.04.2020 (Route No.17 i.e Hansi to Julana); (iv) HR2020-SC0091A dated 13.04.2020 (Route No.17 i.e Hansi to Julana); (v) HR2020SC-0118A dated 13.04.2020 (Route No.17 i.e Hansi to Julana); and (vi) HR2020-SC-0160A dated 13.04.2020 (Route No.17 i.e Hansi to Julana) (Annexure P-16) issued in favour of respondents No.5 to 10 in violation of the order/directions dated 21.01.2020 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No.556 of 2020 (arising out of SLP (Civil) SACHIN MEHTA 2021.03.15 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CWP-9515-2020 -2No.22800/2017) and further being in violation of order/memo dated 30.03.2020 (Annexure P/13) and 06.05.2020 (Annexure P-17) issued by respondent No.2.

It transpires that for the last 10 consequtive dates of hearing, no one has turned up on behalf of petitioner in this case. In view of the above, it seems that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.

Consequently, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. (MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU) JUDGE March 05, 2021 Sachin M.

Whether speaking/ reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No SACHIN MEHTA 2021.03.15 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh