← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/20288/2022allowed

Pardeep Kumar Alias Pradeep Kumar Bhartiya v. State Of Haryana

2022-09-14Mr. Justice Harnaresh Singh Gill2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20288-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.09.2022 PARDEEP KUMAR ALIAS PRADEEP KUMAR BHARTIYA

...Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Nagees Ahmad Khan, Advocate for Mr. Virat Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gagandeep Singh Chhina, AAG Haryana.

**** HARNARESH SINGH GILL , J.

(ORAL) Through this petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.252 dated 30.09.2021, registered under Sections 406, 420, 494 and 120-B IPC, at Police Station Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar.

Vide order dated 12.05.2022 passed by this Court, the petitioner had been granted ad interim pre-arrest bail and directed to join the investigation.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the aforesaid order passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Baldev Singh, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is now not required for any further investigation.

AMAN JAIN 2022.09.14 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-20288-2022 (O&M) -2In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 12.05.2022 granting interim bail to the petitioner, is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

14.09.2022 (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) Aman Jain JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2022.09.14 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment