Gurjit Kaur & ANR v. State Of Punjab & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-35449-2015 Date of Decision: January 7, 2016 Gurjit Kaur and another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Naveen Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.P.S.Ghuman, Addl.A.G.Punjab.

Ms.Ramandeep, Advocate for Mr.Sumeet Goel, Advocate for respondent No.5-CBI.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the accused has since died during his incarceration.

Learned counsel for the State has not controverted the above fact.

Ordered accordingly.

January 7, 2016 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2016.01.08 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh